a
35
appealing
l's
to
www
to the Count for assistance, but reglect in the collection was contemplated when such appeal
wad
gim ly Ordinance, or in other acords, it was never intended that a Court of Justice
should be converted into a sub-Collectirate
supply
of Resume to remedy the wrous or the defects of an Executive Department.
14.
At the same time it is proper
to show that the Clent of the Court was
and
madive in dealing with the plaintõr that the subordinate Officers of the Cowt postponed the Govenment Revenue matter in favor of the
more
ordinary business of
the Court, or as the Report of the Commission
puts it, the Bailiff made the duty of
collecting the ratis" subsidiary (or subordinate?)
¡
"to the discharge of his functions in respect of the ordinary business of the Count ", that is the Court placed the Govnument in a cowse positions than an ordinary Suiter.
10.
As regards the Bailiff it is surprising
that the Court seems to cconcise little control
or
ων
supervision
over this Officer for it dow
that he
not seem le consider it necessary it
shall account for the monies he colleds;
ao
to his being "frequently robbed." it must be remarked that his duly is to pay
monies received
over the
by him, and he should
have no public money over 24 hours in
his prosession of which it might be possible, to rob him. I've shall at once be called on
for security.
16.
The Comunission observe on the
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.